My Understanding of Art History and the fundamental shift from a dominant western culture to the rise of a native fine art movement in a Global Community
Academic
experiences have taught me that the humanities-social science theories
of modern western art history was the foundation for most of the
professional curators, art historians, and critics who are working
today. They were all taught from one point of view designed to
support the modern art movements as we know it. In retrospect we
understand that identity politics theory developed during the early
1970s to the mid 1990s involving native versus colonial political
theories evolved as more people became educated and asked questions and
understood the dynamics of the world we live in. National and
local debates involving public-funded art and political alignments of
artists and the art world institutions have negatively impacted the
local/native art acquisitions and financial support for native art here
in Hawaii and in North America.
A review of the
contemporary art work being created today confirms the presence of
Native people at the forefront of the visual arts, they are addressing
issues—such as identity, place, language and history—that have
personal, cultural and universal relevance which makes their art very
popular. (See Changing Hands II, Museum of Art and Design New York)
These
artists often prefer to let their work speak for itself, believing that
what is made of stone, wood, glass, steel, bone, rope, or any of dozens
of other media should not be explained, or possibly undermined, by
providing a meaning which could foreclose interpretation. It is not the
job of the artist, some feel, to tell the viewer what to think or to
provide a conclusion. All artworks are open to many interpretations,
with the artist's being just one (albeit a privileged one, perhaps). Yet,
with all art (and not just "ethnic" art), there are possibilities of
meaning which the artist can help us discover. There are personal and
cultural dimensions interwoven in a work of art, dimensions which are
so personal or so specific that only the artist's clarification can
help us in the process of discovery. The artist can provide us with a
map to guide our understanding, or better yet, a frame which offers a
context for the individual vision that is manifested in a particular
work. Effective questions that I have struggled with while moving
through history have included: the status/role/function of the material
art object why make sculpture in a digital and post-Internet world
where technology has eliminated the need for the artist? Where are the
art/culture power centers today? What impact does cultural evolution
play in Contemporary Global Art market? The old art world hubs of New
York, Paris, Berlin, London have changed as more native people became
educated, wealthy and started to support their own native
artists. I noted the rise of Asian artists establishing
international identity and museums like the Peabody Essex Museum
embracing the fact that the native culture continues to evolve –
linking dead art and living artists from the same culture is a good
thing which has changed the way museums deal with art. I also
experienced major transitions in the art world. The moving of art off
the walls and pedestals and into the "living spaces" to achieve more
interactions between the viewer and the art work, and the scale of
sculptures based on anthropometric relationships became important
features of my own art work. The traditional gallery model has
been deconstructed from a formal gallery - exhibitions are not
dependent on jurors and instead self regulated by artists, cultural
rituals have become common place in native fine art exhibitions. (Te
Waka Exhibt New York) I also noted the power of the major international
art fairs, festivals, and biennials rethinking and reshaping the global
art community so that there are now multiple venues all over the world
to celebrate art such as Documenta, Santa Fe and the Sydney Biennial.
In
January [1995] I went to New Zealand for two weeks with 80 contemporary
fine artists from the U.S. , Pacific Rim and the Pacific Islands. They
were from Australia and New Guinea, Hawaii, Japan, and the Pacific
Northwest Coast. I met a friend named Harry Fonseca a Santa Fe artist
of Nisenan Maidu, Hawaiian, and Portugese heritage and we talked about
the state of art. It was a cultural exchange and symposium that was put
on by Te waka Toi in New Zealand that is incredibly supportive of all
artists and the arts on a global basis. We had a large tent to work in.
The painters were in one area and the weavers were in one area and the
carvers/sculptors in another area. We worked when we wanted to. There
was more to it than just an exchange of ideas. As soon as we saw each
other, we didn't have to say anything. We understood where we were with
one another. All these artists working in one tent created some
powerful Art. We both agreed that one of the things that was happening
all over the world now, is that artists are paying attention to their
backgrounds and their nationality and how it affects the fine art that
they are creating. There is a tremendous amount of energy being spent
in art history and the development of their ideas. That's something
that I have been working with for a long time, and when you see that in
so many other artists from different parts of the world and they are
dealing with very similar issues you realize it's a beat that's going
on and it is grounded in being a native person and contemporary
artist existing in a Global Community.
As
our world of art continues to evolve it is important to take note of
major historical developments in art by reviewing the trends occurring
in three periods of time as follows:
Modern Art Period (1920-1950s) Economics:
art markets are small, few artists are known. Galleries and dealers are
making a market in modern art works mainly in NY and Paris. Wealthy
collectors are establishing the market value of new artists by buying
their work. Museums began establishing collections of "modern" works of
art. Post-war economic boom lead to increased sales of art work and the
art world hub shifted in power from Europe/Paris to New York. Artist
struggled with traditions that evolved out of the European art
evolution, eventually overcoming tradition but new work was understood
in the context of grand narrative of art and cultural history of Europe. Art
was formal and focused on material problems of the mediums. Abstraction
was privileged over representational art in New York and was an
artistic revolution which was embraced by wealthy collectors. Artists
as visionary outsiders provided their point of view about the world
around them and they relied the art business world for survival and
their communication of ideas patronage was vital to their continued
development. Many artists identified with the spiritual or
transcendental teaching and philosophies. Others engaged in political
resistance to capitalist economics and class system and each group had
their own patrons and support systems.
Baby Boom Art Period (1950-80s)
Economics:
art market expands with growth in demographics in art world players and
growth of commercial art market. More aspiring artists entering the art
scene, colleges churning out thousands of BFAs / MFAs looking for
market validation and a patron base attracted to the romance of being
an artist but the demographics made it very difficult. Many artists challenged the "Western Art" paradigms; which lead to the deconstruction of traditional art media and genres. Continuation
of art works that question the underlying foundation of art, new media
and art spaces evolved including performance art and conceptual art.
New Creative media including Photography, video, lighting, landscape
installations displace the traditional fine art of painting and
sculpture. Clash of movements in establishing the identity and goals
of art and artists leads to fragmentation and pluralism. Art is seen
as performance acts by artists more than finished objects for business
transactions.
Contemporary1990s - today
Economics: art market
declines in recession artists take on real jobs and continue to engage
in art making. Patron base is diminished. Artists access institutional
funding, grants, funded shows and festivals, rely on museum purchases.
High end art market auction business and upper tier galleries flourish.
International art world museum-institutional sectors becoming closely
aligned in an effort to control artistic development. Internationalization
and globalization of art world "industry" contiues to clash with
unresolved identity politics native versus mainstream. National and
ethnic identity tensions impact the achievement of international
standing and global market value. Adoption of computer and
mechanical techniques impact commercial image styles, effectively
removing the visible artist’s "hand," there is increased use of
industrial materials and art work execution is altered. Patrons embrace
the acceptance of photography and video in "high art" contexts. Artists
continue to rely on grants, media attention, gallery shows, and museum
exhibitions. (avant-garde) artists exist outside of the mainstream and
are not accountable to the public or the marketplace.
A working definition of Art
The
most common usage of the word "art," is understood to denote skill used
to produce an aesthetic result. It is "the use of skill and imagination
in the creation of aesthetic objects, environments, or experiences that
can be shared with others." By any of these definitions of the word,
artistic works have existed for almost as long as humankind: from early
pre-historic art to contemporary art; however, some theories restrict
the concept to modern Western societies. Theories are subject to
change and we are witnessing it now with the evolution of contemporary
native art movements.
Art is often intended to appeal and
connect with human emotion. It can arouse aesthetic or moral feelings,
and can be understood as a way of communicating these feelings. Artists
express something so that their audience is aroused to some extent, but
they do not have to do so consciously. Art explores what is commonly
termed as the human condition that is essentially what it is to be
human. Effective art often brings about some new insight concerning the
human condition either singly or en-mass, which is not necessarily
always positive, or necessarily widens the boundaries of collective
human ability. The degree of skill that the artist has, will affect
their ability to trigger an emotional response and thereby provide new
insights, the ability to manipulate them at will shows exemplary skill
and determination.
Closing note we live a a dynamic world and it is
important to acknowledge the past, present and future and it just
depends on whose point of view you are looking at.
|